Interview: Stellan Skarsgård, River

Standard
WARNING: Embargoed for publication until 04/08/2015 - Programme Name: River - TX: n/a - Episode: River - First Look (No. n/a) - Picture Shows: EMBARGOED UNTIL 00:01HRS, TUESDAY 4th AUGUST, 2015 John River (STELLAN SKARSGARD) - (C) Kudos - Photographer: Nick Briggs

 (C) Kudos – Photographer: Nick Briggs

Stellan Skarsgård has always been a fine actor, so when the Swede was announced as the lead in Abi Morgan’s six-part cop drama there was a ripple of excitement within the crime drama-loving fraternity. When I saw River a month or so ago at its media screening I was not only struck how good he was as John River, but how sensitive and interesting Morgan’s story is. Anyway, we got hold of an interview with Skarsgård, which is over the jump…

The Killing Times: What’s the story of River?
Stellan Skarsgård: If it was a normal TV series it would be rather easy to tell you about it but it’s not and that’s why I’m in it. You could say it’s a crime story on the surface, but it’s really more about a person’s breakdown or his psychological status. This police officer I’m playing, he has a mental disorder. We’ve heard a lot about people that hear voices, but he actually sees those people as well that he’s talking to, and very often it is victims of crime that pop up and have conversations with him. They’re not like ghosts, they’re his own creations.

TKT: Who is River and where do we join him in the story?
SS: When you meet River in the first episode, he’s in a car together with his colleague Stevie outside a fast food drive-through joint. That’s where it starts, but his colleague who was probably closest to him, has been murdered three weeks earlier and we learn he is working on the case of solving her murder, as well as all other cases that pop up during his journey. Very often the victims of murder cases show up and have discussions with him, and try to help him solve the crime; ‘manifests’ as we call them. As an audience, we see those victims, or ‘manifests’, as real living people in a room, but of course it’s not the victim that is helping him solve the crime because the victim is dead. We’re not talking about ghosts here, he produces these dialogues himself: they are an internal discussion almost like his own kind of checklist as he investigates their lives and the moments leading to their death. The audience see these characters and get used to them being around, and should be happy (or scared in some instances) to see them when they show up even if you know they’re dead. It’s always interesting when they do: it sort of jars reality, but in an intriguing way.

TKT: What’s the effect of the manifests on River’s life and relationships?
SS: Well he’s a police officer, and he’s supposed to have a record that shows no psychological problems whatsoever and he’s of course hiding this, but it’s hard when he suddenly starts talking to somebody who isn’t there. Some of those situations become quite comical and some are tragic. His behaviour is of course bizarre sometimes to the people around him, but the audience can see who he’s talking to so the audience are hopefully on his side.

TKT: Would you say the presence of those manifests is an extreme representation of a common experience?
SS: It’s a tool in this drama of course, but some people hear voices and can’t get rid of them. Most people have inner dialogues; before you go into a meeting, you might even make the dialogue of that meeting before you enter the door just to rehearse yourself. The manifests are a way to play the internal life of a person which is not necessarily what it looks like on the surface but what it feels like inside.

TKT: Can you relate to River and to that aspect of his character?
SS: I can relate to anybody and I can relate to River too, but it’s not like “Oh yeah I’ve seen a lot of manifests myself’ It’s nothing like that. I relate to him; when he’s angry I can relate to his anger and when he’s sad I can relate to his sadnesss, when he’s jealous I can relate to his jealousy, as we all do.

TKT: Are the manifests serving a purpose that’s helping or assisting River?
SS: They serve a purpose for River. First of all he’s a very lonely man and they are his friends, like children have imaginary friends, but in his case it’s pathological. They serve the purpose that an inner dialogue can serve for you of course, but they also terrorise him because some of them represent the darkest sides of him.

TKT: Have you enjoyed working with Abi’s writing and bringing that to life?
SS: I took the job for her writing because it doesn’t look like anything else. Her writing is not linear. It’s more filled with odd impulses. It throws you from one thought to another thought in a less organised way, and to me that resembles life much more than a lot of the writing you get which is extremely structured and polished and is by the book of ‘How to Write a Screenplay’. I find I’m looking for what I can do with the words because the poetry is there in her writing. Her dialogue often takes the character and repositions them so often in a short dialogue that it becomes very interesting. Very different, but very interesting for the actors to work with.

TKT: How does River differ from so many other cop shows out there?
SS: I don’t know exactly how this show will differ from other shows but I think we’re all doing our best to be sure it does. First of all, the satisfaction of the show is not to find out who did it, the satisfaction of the show lies in the beautifully written characters and what’s happening between them and their relationships. Hopefully it will have a tone of its own, and a tone of its own that works. We’re taking some risks in the way we do it and that makes it very interesting. Without risk, it’s not worthwhile is it? It’s a pretty highly strung and tense show because the psychological stakes are high, and the personal stakes for a lot of the people are also high. It’s a mixture of the danger of illegal actions and psychological vulnerability.

TKT: How do you execute acting with the manifests?
SS: How we practically do it is we usually shoot the scene first with the actor who plays the manifest and then we shoot the same scene exactly the same way but without anybody there. It looks fantastic, because you walk around, you gesture and talk to somebody that isn’t there and it’s quite interesting visually. To me, I’m the kind of actor who doesn’t want to act towards a mark beside the camera; I want the real actor to be there, and I feed so much off the other actors. So it’s very unnatural to me to do it, but since we always do the scene with the actor first I have a very clear memory and then we do it with the real actor saying the lines, so I still get a response and it becomes more like playing a game of ping pong.

TKT: For the viewer, what would you hope they get from watching River?
SS: I hope of course that they would be entertained, not necessarily in the sense that it’s the average kind of entertainment; I want them to be entertained but in a different way and maybe find some fascination in things that they don’t usually see. It’s very much a series about humans and human behaviour; extremely lovely, warm and compassionate without being overly sentimental… It’s all made with a lot of love for life, even if on some levels that can be depressing or sad, on other levels it’s like life; comical and dramatic and funny.

River: Tuesday 13th October, 9pm, BBC1

2 thoughts on “Interview: Stellan Skarsgård, River

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s