Review: Acquitted (S1 E4-6/10), Walter Presents

577d2e4b84ae08b974ef67eb-1467877083180It’s been a relentlessly wet and miserable day here in London town, so it only seemed right not to leave the house, make myself some nice food and settle down to watch lots of TV. Yesterday, I watched the first three episodes of Walter Presents’ new Norwegian import, Acquitted, and I enjoyed it. It was a multi-layered tale of a hotshot businessman, based in Malaysia, called back to his hometown of Lifjorden in Norway to save a company that was the lifeblood of the town. Nothing too dramatic about that, you might think, but there were big-old wrinkles to this story: Aksel Borgen was going back to a hometown he hadn’t visited for 20 years, since he was acquitted of the murder of his girlfriend, Karine. The CEO of the company he had been asked to save? His deceased girlfriend’s mother, who still thinks he’s guilty of the crime.

NB: This has spoilers in it, so if you haven’t seen it yet please don’t read

There was a moment in those first three episodes where Aksel threw a stone into the still waters of the enormous, calm fjord that Lifjorden looks out onto. In essence, this visual metaphor summed up the story: how one incident can cause ripples throughout the years and decades, and how someone at the centre of that incident can have such a dramatic effect on those who were left to pick up the pieces.

We saw this in those first three episodes: how his stoner brother Erik, bitter since his arrival, had been forced to care for their emotionally damaged mother; how their mother had had to cope with obscene abuse from locals who were convinced Aksel was guilty, to the point where she’s now terrified of letting anyone into her house; how Tonje, the ex-girlfriend who had supplied the alibi that secured his release from jail all those years ago, had still harboured feelings for him; how Eva and William, Karine’s parents, had kept up appearances all this time and now were falling apart; how Lars, Eva and William’s son and Karine’s brother, had grown into a timid man; and, crucially, how Aksel’s wife, Angeline and son Tim, had no clue about his volatile past.

That was all about to change.

If the first three episodes had taken its time to establish characters and play out the business side of the story, episode four started with a bomb-drop of potential conflict – Angeline and Tim had decided to surprise Aksel with a visit to Lifjorden. As soon as they got on the ferry, they were asked if they were the family of Aksel Nilsen. They said no, but alarm bells started to ring. (Aksel Nilsen? But our Aksel is called Aksel Borgen…)

Sure enough, the arrival of Angie and Tim signalled a change in pace and focus – thanks to pressure from Angie (a naturally inquisitive lawyer), secrets began to tumble out. Aksel’s arrest, incarceration and subsequent acquittal, his relationship with Tonje (past and present) and even what happened on that fateful night. Well, not quite.

At the end of episode five, Tim confronted his father after being goaded by a local teen about being the son of a murderer. Aksel finally broke. That cocksure, arrogant man who was used to making millions at the push of a button and getting whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted, but had no clue how to deal with real people in real, emotional situations, broke down and wept in front of his wife and son, admitting that he didn’t remember what had happened the night Karine had died.

It was a pivotal moment in the story and for our perception of the character – suddenly he was vulnerable, likeable, even, but also one that couldn’t be trusted. It was a moment that also changed the piece from a slow-burning family drama with a bit of crime into a genuine whodunit – with our main character still a prime suspect. In essence, Aksel had decided to stick around and find out what had happened to Karine once and for all, even though he knew he could well be the person who did it. It was classic noir territory.

But there was so much more going on: Tim had fallen for Lars’s daughter, Heline, in a star cross’d lovers storyline; and Erik, still bitter at how life and his brother had treated him, was full of intrigue as his relationship with Åse played out.

Yes, some scenes were clunky, and yes, the actress playing Angie is a touch on the wooden side (apologies to Elaine Tan, who’s an experienced actress… and to be fair it’s not just her, all the English-speaking characters were. Perhaps that was something to do with the characters who spoke English), but there’s so much meat on the bone here while it explores believable human reactions to traumatic situations. It’s intriguing, it has depth and it’s a good story.

Paul Hirons

For our episodes 1-3 review, go here


7 Comments Add yours

  1. Sara Latham says:

    Totally agree, Angie is spoiling it for me a bit. Infact the parts in English are strangley awkward I think. Still the plot could go in several directions. Maybe it’s the brother? Maybe not. Took me ages to realise where I had seen Angie, she was in Corrie years ago.


    1. Paul Hirons says:

      Yeah, she’s a British/Asian actress. Also appeared in Doctor Who, too (I think). I’m enjoying it though!


    2. Charlotte Carling says:

      The parts in English are indeed awkward. I’m a bit puzzled how there can be such a difference in quality really. This is certainly not the only Nordic series where there has been a difference in quality for different languages (Modus was another example of this), but this is a bit extreme. The dialogues between Aksel and Angelina feel very unnatural and that goes for both the normal converations and the fights. It’s just not a convincing portrayal of a couple that have known eachother for 17 years.

      Also, what kind of caricature is Degang Adams supposed to be? Totally over the top obnoxious idiot while checking in at the hotel and immediately rude for no reason when meeting Lars at the office. Is that the typical ruthless businessman or something? Because they don’t know how to be polite and a bit smooth when things aren’t just so?

      The Norwegian characters and acting are much more believable. William and Erik are the highpoints as far as I’m concerned. And I was also wondering if it might be 14 year old Erik who was the culprit.


  2. Sara Latham says:

    Me too, have watched 3 today! :)


  3. Sara Latham says:

    Charlotte, I completely agree. In fact as the start of the series was in English, I nearly ditched it after 20 mins! It is very odd. I do think Ange is very wooden (sorry) and yes, they are not believable at all as a couple. The whole Malaysian business stuff is so cliched. Also agree that it is pointing to the brother (‘they looked so alike when they were young.’..) . Quite like the storyline about the mum. Still think Aksel *could* be guilty though.


    1. Charlotte Carling says:

      I don’t remember exactly why I didn’t finish this series the last time but I think the English awkwardness must have been part of it.

      Let’s see if there will be a good solution to the murder. For a moment I was thinking it might even be the mother who committed the murder and then lost it – but probably not…


  4. Jane Ross says:

    I find the constant high angle driving, mountain and fjord scenes a bit much actually. On the whole the storyline is being strung out too much with Aksel constantly in and out of suspicion which gets boring. Especially now they have added another 8 episodes – I’m on the 2nd one of this series and not sure if I will keep going. Who is there left to suspect?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.