REVIEW: Manhunt (S1 E3/3)

For two episodes, we’ve seen Martin Clunes’ DCI Colin Sutton go on the hunt for the killer of Amélie Delagrange… and Marsha McDonnell… and Milly Dowler. Reports in today’s newspapers suggest that the killer – Levi Bellfield – may have attacked more people.

We’ve seen Sutton battle with his own obsessive nature (that has caused friction with his wife), the Surrey police force who are working on the Dowler case (that has also caused friction with his wife), and internal rumblings within his own team. These may have been real-life undercurrents that actually happened, but they’ve provided a dramatic counterbalance to the procedural investigation.

We left Sutton and the team battling against the clock – they had five days to gather enough evidence to bring Bellfield in before the News Of The World was to run a story naming him as a suspect.

The race was on to find enough evidence to not only arrest Bellfield, but prove he did it. What followed was a tense, extremely well-constructed procedural journey – there were pitfalls, there were breaks in the case, there were frantic searches, there were lots of exasperated swearing and there were mistakes made. Real mistakes made. This helter-skelter journey to justice was enhanced by the appearance of Bellfield himself, which had the same sort of effect as seeing Edmund Kemper in Mindhunter – it was grotesque, it was terrifying and you were thankful that even an actor playing Levi Bellfield was separated from you by a TV screen, so snarling, unstable and horrid was he.

At the centre of it all was Martin Clunes’ DCI Colin Sutton, a man who backed himself and once he got a sniff wouldn’t let go. He formed a very watchable double team with DC Jo Brunt, and it was good to see that she unearthed a crucial piece of evidence near the end. Another crucial piece of evidence? The way Bellfield’s partner – who had put up with years of psychological and physical abuse – had provided Sutton with courageous testimony and, tellingly, gave him the link between her partner and Milly Dowler.

As the evidence built up, there were dead ends and a few head-in-hands moments – Sutton implored his team to continue to be thorough and carry on. He had finally become a Churchill, and the team now took notice.

So what did I make of Manhunt? It was well-made, well acted and to be congratulated on showing respect to the victims and as much of the mundane elements of real police work as possible. Saying all that, and it was a praiseworthy series, I do find these dramatisations difficult to judge. The dialogue was perfunctory and expositionary in the extreme at times and it was very join-the-dots in terms of plotting and pacing. But what was I really expecting? As I said in episode one’s review, writers of dramatisations often find themselves between a rock and a hard place – go too off-road and they’ll be accused of exploitation of sensitive subject matter; stick too close to the facts and they might as well just make a documentary.

Which leads me to an all-pervading question I found myself asking at the end of this: why do we watch these kinds of dramatisations? What value do they have to the drama genre, and what effect do they have on the greater societal psyche? It’s a question that’s always grappled with when it comes to true crime. On the one hand, if you have people coming forward with new information – as in this situation – then it has given people courage and/or jogged their memories, and it has been worth it.

Judging by a lot of the social media reaction to Manhunt – largely very positive, with a lot of people enjoying those hardcore, non-sensationalist procedural elements – people like to shout from their sofas, “MONSTER!” as if Levi Bellfield is a pantomime villain. Manhunt shows he is assuredly not, but there is that element of booing and hissing at a killer on the telly. And, there’s another explanation: we like to be scared, it gives us a rush and the nearer to the real world it is, perhaps the scarier it is and, therefore, the more strangely thrilling it is. Maybe there’s a bit of collective grief here, too, and there’s perhaps the fact that crime fiction and crime drama – even based on real-life events – generally come with a resolution, and is a kind of controlled, hermetically-sealed experience.

Mix all these ingredients up into a bowl and I’m sure the answer is in there somewhere – it’s a question we’ll always continue to ask, especially when it comes to dramatisations of sensitive, tragic, real-life events depicted expertly in Manhunt.

Paul Hirons

TO READ OUR EPISODE ONE REVIEW CLICK HERE

TO READ OUR EPISODE TWO REVIEW CLICK HERE

 

Advertisements

14 Comments Add yours

  1. malerogue says:

    Excellent police procedural though the dialogue was slightly lacking at times. Martin Clunes maybe trying too hard to shed his Doc Martin persona.

    Like

    1. Elizabeth Macpherson says:

      I haven’t ever watched the Doc series, only Men Behaving Badly.

      Like

  2. Elizabeth Macpherson says:

    Your review was wonderful to read. Sutton did become Churchillian. Bravo to him I say.
    I was a police officer at the time of The Yorkshire Ripper (Oh all those nights & hours verbally recording every vehicle that drove by you – it was Mosside, Manchester – a lot of vehicles), so I can have a perspective along police lines.
    However, this is the 1st ‘local’ murder crime that I have watched on tv. I haven’t watched the Wests, Moors Murderers (my father investigated the latter). I’ve tried to phantom why. Maybe, I didn’t want to hear details that my mind hadn’t come across, or in the latter, I was the same age group as the children murdered. I don’t know.
    This series brought me to proper tears.
    I will say that it was extremely well done. And dare I say it – acted.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Elizabeth Macpherson says:

      please ignore the obvious ‘predictive’ text errors.

      Like

      1. Andy D says:

        Elizabeth have you ever read the Red Riding Trilogy or seen the dramas based on them? Having served at tgat time I wondered what your thoughts on them would be.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Paul Hirons says:

      Thank you Elizabeth, and how fascinating that you worked on the Ripper case. Must have been an incredible time in lots of different ways. I would imagine Manhunt brought back a lot of memories…

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Andy D says:

    I felt a lot of the story was clunky in terms of the writing and his wife was portrayed poorly. Paul you raise some really excellent points about the nature of true crime. Certainly there is the vicarious element, but also lifting the lid on how the cases really unfolded. I can imagine the discovery of the sealed tape was met with more than an “oh my god”, but it did show these coppers are human beings capable of mistakes that can cost lives. In some ways these dramas help reinforce the amazing jobs the police do in these examples but also can tend to blur the lines between reality and fiction. This was definitely one of the more respectful adaptations I’ve seen but still left me feeling why did it need to be made in the first place.

    Like

  4. Elizabeth Macpherson says:

    Andy D, yes I have watched the Red Riding trilogy. That was so close to home – mind/work :(
    That was a series that was extremely well done & brought out anger, shame within me. I didn’t do anything wrong – but the , I can’t think of the correct word to describe, awfulness (mediocre adjective) of how, not just the police, but people in general’s attitude to young people is behind appalling (sp?)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Elizabeth Macpherson says:

      Predictive text warning!

      Liked by 1 person

    2. Elizabeth Macpherson says:

      Andy D i had gotten the title ‘red riding’ mixed up with a different programme. Apologies. It was ‘3 girls’, or a similar title that I watched. So my words were meant for ‘3 girls’.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Andy D says:

        Thanks Elizabeth! The reason I asked is because that series reflects on the policing of the Ripper case (and a parallel fictional case in the books) in the Yorkshire area during the 1970s. It was broadcast on Channel 4 in three parts from different directors and is still available to watch (although the books are a lot better) : https://www.channel4.com/programmes/red-riding

        In terms of your emotions from the time, the Police as a whole was so disjointed in this country it’s a miracle more things didn’t go wrong! I for one thank you for your service, you should feel no shame about being mixed up in larger societal issues at the time – it’s only really in hindsight we can account for things like that! Just imagine what we’ll all be saying about the current era in 20 years!!

        Like

  5. malerogue says:

    Its programs like Manhunt that makes you realise how daft Luther and Killing Eve are and how good Unforgotten, Keeping Faith,Red Ridingand and Three Girls are.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Grimlockx81 says:

    Thoroughly enjoyable series and website in general. New here and have to say i’m enjoying the writing style and reviews i’ve read to date. hard to take Martin seriously after his extensive catalogue of comedic roles but generally well acted throughout.

    Like

    1. Paul Hirons says:

      Thanks Grimlock!

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.