REVIEW Manhunt The Night Stalker (S2 E4/4)

So here we go then. In the midst of a gigantic surveillance operation, now was the time to see how DCI Colin Sutton and his team were going to catch this awful human, The Night Stalker, who had carried out burglaries and sexual assaults on older people – 99 per cent women – since the early 1990s.

By now, the whole of southeast London was in the grip of fear. Some survivors even reported living on the same street as a previous victim of his crimes years earlier. That previous incident scared them, and now their worst nightmare had come true.

In this respect, Manhunt The Night Stalker reminded me of those classic tales of American serial killers of who terrified whole neighbourhoods in the 1970s and 80s. Son Of Sam, the Golden State Killer (check out the late Michelle McNamara’s book and documentary series I’ll Be Gone In The Dark), these deranged men caused panic and paranoia. Minstead Man proved that the UK was not immune to such horrendous individuals.

However, and back to the drama, the way he was caught was slightly surprising. Throughout this series Sutton was being built up almost as a supercop, certainly by his peers. So even though it was following the real story closely, it still felt brave to remove Sutton from the moment Minstead Man was caught.

Sutton, so exhausted by his all-night shifts, was relieved of his duties and spent the night asleep. Until he got that phone call from Nathan at Central 3000. (Central 3000, I still can’t get over that name.)

When it all did kick off – a spotting of a grey Vauxhall Safira, initially partially obscured by another car so they couldn’t be completely sure; a coordinated following of the driver who had emerged from the same street where a tell-tale burglary had been reported; and leaving it until they were outside the surveillance jurisdiction as not to blow their cover – it was thrilling. Quietly, creepingly thrilling.

Delroy Grant.

A man who was worried about his wife, who he cared for at home. A chatty, polite, affable man. A man who seemed to know the game was up but when he let his guard down revealed a sneering malevolence. And a man, crucially, who provided a DNA match.

What was interesting about this final episode was that it followed conventional crime drama structures (the chase, the tension etc) but still managed to retain an authentic, non-sensationalist feel. The fact that Sutton was not – and didn’t need to be – present when Grant was caught flew in the face of the traditional ‘hero cop’ trope.

What was also clever was the way Sutton’s encroaching retirement brought with it examinations of purpose, mortality and everything we think about as we get older. And mostly vulnerability. This vulnerability provided a link to the vulnerability of Grant’s retired elderly victims.

But really, Sutton and Ed Whitmore did an excellent job of both being true and respectful to those caught up in Grant’s heinous web of terror, and giving us procedural – and fascinating – thrills and spills.

Paul Hirons

EPISODE RATING:

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

SERIES RATING:

Rating: 4 out of 5.

READ MORE: OUR EPISODE ONE REVIEW

READ MORE: OUR EPISODE TWO REVIEW

READ MORE: OUR EPISODE THREE REVIEW

One Comment Add yours

  1. Elizabeth Macpherson says:

    Excellent series. Horrifying.
    I’ve been following the Joseph Deangelo’s case (Golden State Killer). Absolutely worse than nightmare stuff & what makes it worse was his profession. I’ve read McManara’s book & another which I’ve forgotten the title of.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.